Why don't we stop excuting the criminal to death?
Resently taiwan has a big issue of sentence criminal to death penalty owing to claim of the minister of justice. Why don't we cancel the death penalty? When we discuss the main purpose of death penalty that must be the warning of the society. But there must isn't an action on an impulse if one man commit a deadly crime. They have an unique thinking which is deeply conceal in their mind. have people be attentive to the consequence of crime in the event of the penalty excuted ? Furthermore, most of the investication point out that there are a abnormal experience in criminal's childhood. Let us pay attention to the efficiency of children welfare foundation rather than dispute death penalty excuted or not.
為何不廢死刑?
台灣四十四個罪大惡極的死刑犯目前因為法務部長主張廢死而廣被社會輿論所討論
為何不廢死刑?就死刑本身最原始的目的來看應是警示作用大於實質作用
但當一個人犯下泯滅人性的過錯才會被判死刑
這些人犯罪的心態絕不是一時衝動
而是潛意識中深植著非常人的思維模式
現在社會上有潛在犯重罪因子的人會因為這些人的死而有所警惕嗎?
有研究論文指出犯罪者幾乎都有著悲慘或是不正常的童年
與其討論該不該將已被逮捕而無犯罪可能的罪犯處死
不如將心力放在如何讓社福機構的愛心發揮到極致
防止下一個家庭的破碎